Merel Hoedt vs Danique Havermans Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Hoedt vs D. Havermans

Merel Hoedt
NED
w
w
l
w
w
l
w
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
26
Age
23
-
Height
-
767
C. Rank
0
468
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Danique Havermans
NED
w
l
w
w
w
w
l
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
26
Age
23
-
Height
-
767
C. Rank
0
468
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Hoedt 1 - 0 Havermans
They have played 2 sets in total, with Merel Hoedt winning 2 and Danique Havermans winning 0. The last match between Merel Hoedt and Danique Havermans was at the W15 Haren, 06-09-2023, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Merel Hoedt getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hoedt | 1 |
| Havermans | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W15 Haren(09-06-23)
Merel Hoedt
6
6
Danique Havermans
3
2
M. Hoedt vs D. Havermans H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 54.47% (201-168) | Career Total W/L | 50.00% (51-51) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 3 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Hoedt vs D. Havermans Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Merel Hoedt has won 37.07% of points on their second serve, while Danique Havermans has won 38.40%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Merel Hoedt, in recent form, has won 55.42% of their opponent's second serve points, while Danique Havermans has won 54.95%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.55% and 31.20% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Merel Hoedt has saved 45.58% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Danique Havermans has saved 51.14% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Merel Hoedt has won 52.08% of matches played (W/L 25/23), with Danique Havermans winning 60.00% (W/L 21/14) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Merel Hoedt has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 130/101), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/1). Danique Havermans has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 56% (W/L 16/9), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 6/12).
- Player level: In the last year, Merel Hoedt has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 20/15), where as Danique Havermans has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.62% of matches (W/L 17/12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Merel Hoedt winning 1 times and Danique Havermans being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Merel Hoedt winning 2 and Danique Havermans winning 0.
- The last match between Merel Hoedt and Danique Havermans was at the W15 Haren, 06-09-2023, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Merel Hoedt getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:24:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Merel Hoedt has played against opponents with an average rank of 342.17 while Danique Havermans has played against players with an average rank of 224.11.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Merel Hoedt has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Danique Havermans has won 78% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Merel Hoedt has converted 43.37% of breakpoint opportunities, and Danique Havermans has converted 38.98% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Merel Hoedt vs Danique Havermans Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Hoedt vs D. Havermans H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:24:0 | Average Match Time | 1:24:0 |
| 68% (39/57) | 1st Serve % | 65% (37/57) |
| 62% (24/39) | 1st Serve Win % | 46% (17/37) |
| 28% (5/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 10% (2/20) |
| 67% (8/12) | Break Pts Won % | 36% (4/11) |
| 67% (38/57) | Return Points Win % | 49% (28/57) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Hoedt 42%, Havermans 39%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Hoedt 58%, Havermans 56%.
Break Points Saved %: Hoedt 50%, Havermans 57%.
M. Hoedt Recent Matches Played
D. Havermans Recent Matches Played

M. Hoedt vs D. Havermans Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.47% (201/168) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.00% (51/51) |
| 53.98% (448/382) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.07% (119/114) |
| 52.53% (3897/3521) | Games Win/Loss | 50.67% (1129/1099) |
| 52.68% (59/53) | Hard Win/Loss | 33.33% (6/12) |
| 56.28% (130/101) | Clay Win/Loss | 49.15% (29/30) |
| 48.00% (12/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 64.00% (16/9) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 379 | Aces Total | 80 |
| 0.56 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 2030 | Total Double Faults | 250 |
| 1:39:18 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 471.76 | Average Opponent Rank | 236.16 |
| 64% (14157/22063) | 1st Serve % | 62% (1958/3147) |
| 60% (8473/14157) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (1195/1958) |
| 42% (3297/7906) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (480/1189) |
| 50% (1539/3068) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (186/391) |
| 48% (10894/22492) | Return Points Win % | 46% (1456/3182) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52.50% (84/76) | Challenger W/L | 44.44% (4/5) |
| 56.25% (117/91) | Futures W/L | 50.54% (47/46) |
| 54% (194/360) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (51/102) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (29/62) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (7/14) |
| 47% (47/99) | Deciding Set Win % | 41% (12/29) |
| 86% (203/174) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (55/45) |
| 13% (203/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (55/10) |
| 14% (166/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (47/6) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
05:30 PM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
3.34
W2
1.27
10:30 PM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
1.14
W2
6.15
01:00 PM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
1.38
W2
2.76
06:00 PM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
1.69
W2
2.02
04:00 PM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
1.76
W2
2.12
06:00 PM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
1.44
W2
2.55
Potential H2H Matches This Week
Hoedt (W15 Hua Hin)
Hoedt vs LiCould play in The Quarterfinals
Hoedt vs YongmodCould play in The Quarterfinals
Hoedt vs ChanawongCould play in The Quarterfinals
Hoedt vs PatilCould play in The Quarterfinals
Hoedt vs HrabavetsCould play in The Second
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
12 Nov 2025
Laslo Djere vs Tom Paris Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Sebastian Baez vs Alvaro Guillen Meza Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Lorenzo Musetti vs Alex De Minaur Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Nitto ATP Finals – Turin Preview And Prediction: Lorenzo Musetti vs Alex De Minaur Betting Tips & Picks November 11, 2025
11 Nov 2025
Daniel Dutra Da Silva vs Emilio Nava Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Viktor Durasovic vs Shintaro Mochizuki Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
12:00
H2H 5-5
22:30
H2H 5-4
H2H 7-1
13:30
H2H 6-1
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lyon Challenger
France
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Spain
M15 Luanda
Angola
M15 Orlando
United States
M15 San Gregorio di Catania
Italy
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manama
Bahrain
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Monastir
Tunisia
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal